Thanks for these notes, Pete. I incorporated these fixes into the -08 (but apparently neglected to write and say so at the time).
Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.
Document: draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review Date: 2020-01-09
IETF LC End Date: 2019-12-02
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: Ready with Nits
While I found the document (and particularly section 4) very technically dense,
I think the detail will help implementers tremendously. Nothing other than a
few editorial issues.
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
Section 3, paragraph 1:
Note that
a new PASSporT is only necessary when the canonical form of the
"dest" identifier (per the canonicalization procedures in [RFC8224]
Section 8) changes due to this retargeting. If the canonical form of
the "dest" identifiier is not changed during retargeting, then a new
PASSporT with a "div" claim MUST NOT be produced.
Seems to me that these two sentences should be in their own paragraph. It took
me a second to figure out that the following sentence was not related to these.
Section 4:
...Other using protocols of PASSporT
Don't you mean "Other protocols using PASSporT"?
Section 4.2, paragraph 2:
I think you mean "necessarily", not "necessary"
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
