--On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 15:46 -0400 Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ? The standard definition of a roll-call vote is that each > member's name is called aloud in alphabetic order at the > meeting and their response or non-response recorded. > See, for example, the relevant part of Section 45 (Voting > Procedure) in Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised 10th or > 11th Edition. (Sees to be Section 44 in somewhat earlier > editions.) The minutes you quote look like a perfectly good > roll-call vote to me. Don, I have not taken the time to hunt up my version of Robert's Rules, which, in any event, tends to address meetings procedures and not record-keeping. However, the in most present and historical contexts I'm familiar with, the normal practice is that, if there are formal minutes (or equivalent) taken and published, a roll-call vote is a recorded vote. "Recorded", in that context, means who voted which way rather than merely that a vote was taken and passed. I assume the question was actually about why, when the IAOC (quite properly) recorded the results of roll-call votes, the LLC Board, at least for the cited case, seems to no longer be doing that. best, john