Re: IETF Administration LLC information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 15:46 -0400 Donald Eastlake
<d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ? The standard definition of a roll-call vote is that each
> member's name is called aloud in alphabetic order at the
> meeting and their response or non-response recorded.
> See, for example, the relevant part of Section 45 (Voting
> Procedure) in Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised 10th or
> 11th Edition. (Sees to be Section 44 in somewhat earlier
> editions.) The minutes you quote look like a perfectly good
> roll-call vote to me.

Don,

I have not taken the time to hunt up my version of Robert's
Rules, which, in any event, tends to address meetings procedures
and not record-keeping. However, the in most present and
historical contexts I'm familiar with, the normal practice is
that, if there are formal minutes (or equivalent) taken and
published, a roll-call vote is a recorded vote.  "Recorded", in
that context, means who voted which way rather than merely that
a vote was taken and passed.

I assume the question was actually about why, when the IAOC
(quite properly) recorded the results of roll-call votes, the
LLC Board, at least for the cited 
case, seems to no longer be doing that.

best,
    john





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux