Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 23, 2020, at 1:39 PM, Philip Homburg <pch-ietf-7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't know if you consider http://192.0.2.1/ an ancient protocol, but this
is typically something that breaks with NAT64.

I don’t think this is really relevant to the IoT directorate. A constrained device is not going to be doing this in production.  If your goal is to discuss the question of whether IPv6-only can ever be legitimately asserted on a network, that’s not something that you should Cc: the IoT directorate on.

That said, hard-coded RFC1918 IP literals in URLs are useful for testing, but are simply bad practice for web sites. If your web site relies on this, and end users lose as a consequence, it’s due to your incompetence that they are losing, not due to any failing of the network infrastructure.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux