Hi Russ, Thanks a lot for reviewing the document. All your comments will be addressed in -04, which I plan to submit after the IETF LC ends. On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:40 AM Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Has Nits > > I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area > Directors. Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should > treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments. > > Document: draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2020-06-18 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-07-02 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Has Nits > > > Major Concerns: > > None. > > > Minor Concerns: > > Section 3.4 includes: > > V6ONLY_WAIT The minimum time the client SHOULD stop the DHCPv4 > configuration process for. MUST be no less than > MIN_V6ONLY_WAIT seconds. Default: 1800 seconds > > The second sentence should include a subject; and "MUST NOT" seems like > a better wording to me. I suggest: > > V6ONLY_WAIT The minimum time for which the client SHOULD stop > the DHCPv4 configuration process. The value MUST NOT > be less than MIN_V6ONLY_WAIT seconds. > Default: 1800 seconds. > > > Nits: > > Section 2: s/seems only natural/seems natural/ > > Section 3.3.1: s/for V6ONLY_WAIT second/for V6ONLY_WAIT seconds/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
