Re: Effectiveness of STUN protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michel;

>>>Dan Kolis wrote:
>>>Yes indeed. Probably the #1 biggest use for STUN short
>>>term is going to be SIP. It seems like not too much
>>>information has to go thru the known reachable machine.
>>>Maybe just about the same loading as a DNS server?

>>Wrong.

> No. _you_ are wrong, Dan is right, 

and you say:

> I have to confess that I have not read STUN in much detail,

What a convincing argument.

However, you have to confess that you know nothing about P2P.

> - Michel opens a connection to the P2P server.

> - Dan opens a connection to the P2P server.

You are saying that there are a P2P server and two P2P clients.

Is it a client server app or a P2P app?

> If you don't understand/can't code what's above, don't worry: I know
> plenty of 16-years-old that can code it for me in exchange for the
> latest 60GB mp3 player.

I'm afraid you also confess that you can't code it yourself.

							Masataka Ohta




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]