Effectiveness of STUN protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michel said:
>This is not true. Kaaza does not require to open any ports nor configure
>anything in the NAT box. The latest versions of SIP using STUN don't
>either.

Dan asks:

Yes indeed. Probably the #1 biggest use for STUN short term is going to be
SIP. It seems like not too much information has to go thru the known
reachable machine. Maybe just about the same loading as a DNS server?

So, although its kind of a work around, its probably going to do the job.

Does that seem right?

Dan




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]