+1 to Eric’s point about the announcements.
On Apr 30, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Eric Rescorla < ekr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
4, Please keep it. However, I think it could be improved if you also sent LC *announcements* there.
-Ekr
I give it a 4.5.
I see last call comments on a much more timely basis than I did with all the background noise the IETF list. (Note that I saw _this_ message on the Last-Call list first.) I think it makes a lot of sense to separate the effort of getting the day-to-day work of the IETF done from the broad range of discussions _about_ the IETF.
Ben.
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> (I'm replying to this and adding the last-call list, which I forgot to
> do when I sent it. Please reply to *this* message, to keep both lists
> included.)
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:00 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It's been around six months since we started the <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
>> list, and we said that we would evaluate the results after six months.
>> To that end, the IESG would like to see comments about how it's been
>> working.
>>
>> Please respond to this thread to comment. It would be helpful if the
>> first line of your comment gave a succinct view of your opinion on the
>> following 5-to-1 scale:
>>
>> 5: Perfect! Don't even think about going back!
>> 4: I really like it and want to keep it.
>> 3: Neutral: I don't care either way.
>> 2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to keep it.
>> 1: It's terrible! Please, please go back to the old way!
>>
>> And, of course, if you have further comments beyond those numbers,
>> include those as well. We want to know what you think. Comments,
>> please, in the next couple of weeks, by 15 May. Thanks!
>>
>> Barry, for the IESG
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
