On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michel Py wrote: > IPv6 is currently not worth the price of dual-stack, which is the very > reason it is not being deployed. Some think it's worth the price. In many cases, the price (in terms of money, at least) is zero. In any case, the users are given the opportunity to run applications which leverage IPv6, with or without support from their ISPs or sites. If they don't want to, that's another issue.. > As of transition mechanisms, they're not good enough to run an > IPv6-only network, which in turns makes dual-stack mandatory. No problem, because IPv6-only networks don't make sense anyway. However, the transition mechanisms that have been deployed seem to be good enough to enable dual-stack deployments. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings