On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:48:39 -0500 Mike S <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 12:08 PM 1/10/2004, Richard Welty wrote...
> >might i suggest citing some case law demonstrating the relevance
> >of the statute you cited?
> Non sequitor. By your implied logic, no new laws could be
> effectively created or enforced, since all would lack precedent.
> The relevant code is relatively new, so only limited, if any,
> case law can be expected to be extant in any case.
so, you have a statute dated 1996 which you claim prohibits
certain activities. you are apparently unable to cite any case
law (i don't know if you actually have tried to find any or not,
you simply responded by dismissing the suggestion.)
i suspect you're not a lawyer. i also seriously doubt you've
actually asked a lawyer specializing in this type of law for
an informed opinion.
i think that i don't care to take "legal advice" from you.
have a nice day,
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security