Re: SMTP Minimum Retry Period - Proposal To Modify Mx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:27:53 -0500 Mike S <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 08:42 AM 1/10/2004, Bill Sommerfeld wrote...
> >> > If you think there's some violation of law going on here, please be more 
> >> > specific.  What law, and in what country? 
> >> 
> >> Try to keep up. A specific citation has already been made.
> >
> >and already been debunked.  

> If one considers spraying bullets and so shooting and killing
> innocent bystanders while defending against an assailant as
> legal, then yes, it's been debunked.

might i suggest citing some case law demonstrating the relevance
of the statute you cited?[1]  the rhetoric of your response is
largely content free. w/o supporting case law, your "legal
opinion" is of rather limited value. 

richard

[1] i, for one, will be extremely impressed if you actually dredge
some up. i don't think that statute has any relevance to dns based
BLs, whether a MAPS product or otherwise. the question is one
for the courts to decide, and i'm not at all aware of anyone
actually attempting to use that statute in the manner you suggest.
-- 
Richard Welty                                         rwelty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
    Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]