Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Thus spake "John Stracke" <jstracke@xxxxxxxxxxx>Mine seems to make it. This one is (at least was) signed - I hope :-)
Modifying the Subject: line is a Bad Thing; it invalidates digital
signatures. We're never going to get widespread use of signed email as
long as we have pieces of mail infrastructure munging messages to make
signatures useless.
Signed email already gets mangled by the ietf mail servers (AFAICT), so
what's one more bad idea in the mix? </advocate class=devil>
--
Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- Doug@xxxxxxxxx | Office: (208)520-4044 http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044
We Do Standards - You Need Standards
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature