Re[2]: ITU takes over?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Hoffman / IMC writes:

> Absolutely agree with this sentiment. Anyone who starts an anti-spam
> proposal with "All we need to do is digitally sign the {messages|SMTP 
> transmissions}..." is completely unclear on how little governance 
> there is in this area.

I agree, but isn't this what Yahoo has recently been talking about as
their magic solution to spam?  (None of the reports I've read has been
very clear on exactly what Yahoo has in mind.)



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]