Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
From: leo vegoda <leo@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:06:31 +0100
In-reply-to: <k0+bzLrNPv1$Ew6W@ripe.net>
Sender: owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Turnpike/6.02-U (<7BiAomRdj8KB0L6Vd08o5SzdCI>)

leo vegoda <leo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

I don't think it's clear that the wording in the IPv6 policy document should be improved. It's a bit ambiguous at the moment. We're keen to help improve the text.

An extra "don't" slipped in there.

Sorry,

--
leo vegoda
RIPE NCC
Registration Services Manager

References:
- Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
  - From: Paul Vixie
- Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
  - From: leo vegoda
- Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
  - From: leo vegoda

Prev by Date: Re: [isdf] 1. New Report: "Understanding WSIS" (Hans Klein)
Next by Date: Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
Previous by thread: Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
Next by thread: Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]