Re: SMTP compressed protocol...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:38:20AM -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
> From a simple syntax standpoint, one option with an advertised 
> "prefer/ accept" parameter would do the job, and would be much 
> preferable architecturally to two options.

Yes.

> connection-time-limited

What's a connection-time-limited environment?

> And something batch-oriented also solves the "what to 
> do about those Received headers" problem

As well as the the extra round-trip times problem associated with SMTP.

A disadvantage of batch-oriented approaches is that mail rejection could
happen later.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]