RE: IETF58 - Network Status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, this looks to affect some models of cards and drivers more than other. Unfortunately, I fell this time in the unlucky category. The same model of card, driver, and OS that worked perfectly for many in many other similar events, including the last three or four IETF meetings made my work impossible this whole week with the wireless setting at this IETF network. On this respect this was - for me - by far the worst IETF since I am using wireless connectivity. Sorry guys. 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx]On 
> Behalf Of Roland Bless
> Sent: 13 November, 2003 7:08 PM
> To: Randall Gellens
> Cc: 58crew@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status
> 
> 
> Hi Randall,
> 
> > I have been consistently unable to maintain a connection for more 
> > than a very few minutes, usually not even long enough to 
> establish a 
> > VPN tunnel and fetch one message.  The 802.11 coverage comes and 
> > goes; the APs seem to vanish and I see nothing for a while, 
> > eventually the network comes back but only briefly.  This has been 
> 
> I can partly confirm your observations, since
> I often see my driver reporting a signal strength of 0 for seconds.
> The connection is somehow unstable as my log also reports
> (NSIS meeting this morning, actually not crowded)
> Nov 13 10:41:01  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP In Range (0005)
> Nov 13 10:41:03  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Changed (0003)
> Nov 13 10:41:25  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Out of Range (0004)
> Nov 13 10:41:26  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP In Range (0005)
> Nov 13 10:42:58  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Changed (0003)
> Nov 13 10:45:18  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Out of Range (0004)
> Nov 13 10:45:18  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP In Range (0005)
> Nov 13 10:45:18  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Changed (0003)
> Nov 13 10:45:23  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Out of Range (0004)
> Nov 13 10:45:24  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP In Range (0005)
> Nov 13 10:45:54  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Changed (0003)
> Nov 13 10:46:28  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP Out of Range (0004)
> Nov 13 10:46:28  kernel: eth1: New link status: AP In Range (0005)
> ... and so on...
> however, it seems also to depend on the cards firmware and driver,
> so other people may have no problems at all...
> Inspite all the problems, it works well enough to get things 
> actually done.
> 
> > the case in every session I've attended, as well as tonight's 
> > plenary.  It doesn't seem to matter if the room is crowded 
> or empty, 
> > or where I sit.
> > 
> > I have attempted to only select the 'ietf58' network, but often the 
> > network vanishes and there are no networks visible; other times the 
> > only visible "network" is an ad-hoc calling itself 'ietf58'.
> 
> I wasn't often successful to reattach to APs after my card was
> "hi-jacked" to ad-hoc cards announcing ietf58. Setting the 
> essid again to the same value seems to do trick, however,
> often I see signals of strength 0 (maybe the card is confused then..).
> Furthermore, it happens often that I don't get an IPv6 address
> directly after activating the card (maybe the RA doesn't get through).
> 
> Cheers,
>  Roland
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]