Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> We have been getting some reports of rooted machines (IETF Attendee machines, 
> not IETF NOC Machines) that are scanning and causing a lot of traffic on the 
> network.  IP Addresses are:
> 130.129.139.106
> 130.129.139.203
> Please check your machines for these addresses.  If they are yours, please 
> stop by the terminal room, and ask for help.

It's not only this, but people are still running their cards in ad-hoc mode.
While I'm not an expert on this, I just saw several cards in ad-hoc mode
in Salon B (mip6 session).
There is an ongoing AODV test and I asked the guys at the help desk whether
there may be problems with WLAN infrastructure. They said, "oh no, as long 
as the ssid is different from ietf58, there should be no problem". However,
I just saw my card (in managed mode) connecting to a card in ad-hoc mode
with a different ssid than ietf58 (I scanned that with my PDA at the same time). 
My Orinoco card has the latest firmware (8.72) and possibly my linux driver 
is broken, but obviously there exists this subtle difference between theory 
and practice (at least for my configuration, sorry). This is really annoying,
because it happened several times today.
Besides the fact that I've also seen cards in ad-hoc mode advertising "ietf58",
I was wondering what others think about interference between ad-hoc mode and 
infrastructure mode.

> We are monitoring the mailing list 58crew@xxxxxxxx for problems.
> Comments, suggestions, issues are very welcome here.
> We would rather hear of a problem many times on the list, then not at all or 
> by way of rumor through the meetings.  Please let us know your concerns.

Thanks for your support,
 Roland


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]