Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Alex Zinin <zinin@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, iesg@xxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx, ben@xxxxxxxxxx, "'mpls@xxxxxx'" <mpls@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6182056841.20031104133943@psg.com>
Sender: owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Alex Zinin wrote:

>   What about existing implementations?

There are none that I know of.  If there are any, I would urge them to
speak up!

Kireeti.
-------

References:
- Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Kireeti Kompella
- Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Alex Zinin

Prev by Date: Re: Why Does the US Have Expensive & Obsolescent Broadband?
Next by Date: Re: Palm version of schedule
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Palm version of schedule
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]