Kireeti, What about existing implementations? -- Alex http://www.psg.com/~zinin/ Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 12:09:33 PM, Kireeti Kompella wrote: > Hi Adrian, > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Adrian Farrel wrote: >> MTU >> >> This is a 16-bit unsigned integer that represents the MTU in octets >> for an LSP or segment of an LSP. >> >> >> Is this unnecessarily limiting? Shouldn't we support MPLS over >> L2 technologies that support larger than 64k MTUs? > I'm happy to do so, but I'm not aware of any L2 technology that > supports MTUs greater than 64K. But if no one objects, this field can > be made 32 bits, assuming that that's big enough :-) > Kireeti. > -------