> > > As far as I can tell, the IPv6 site > > > local discussion on both sides is only about moot theories. > > > > That's because you aren't trying to write apps that operate across > > addressing realm boundaries, and you're apparently not willing to listen > > to those who are. > > I am working on an application that works accross addressing realm > bondaries. [...] > That nasty stuff causes all kinds of real world trouble just a couple of messages ago you were claiming that the discussion was about moot theories and now you're claiming that it causes real world trouble. which is it? > So why are you only repeating what you've said many times before instead > of writing an RFC that will repudiate and replace BCP 5? the reason I repeat these things once in awhile is because a significant fraction of people still don't get it, and they're hindering progress. the reason I don't try to repudiate BCP 5 is that it's clear that for IPv4 we're out of addresses, and you can't really solve the problem in IPv4 any other way except to move to another address space.