On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:22:02 EDT, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> said: > role. As the W3C note sort of points out, that would be very > disruptive and would serve no one's interests, least of all that > of ISO's status and reputation. The same week as Verisign's stunt. Coincidence? Maybe not... ;)
Attachment:
pgp00327.pgp
Description: PGP signature