Is it any worse than IE taking you to msn search when a domain doesn't resolve? Or worse than Mozilla taking you to Netscape, duplicating a Google search, and opening a sidebar (and a netscape search) you didn't want? I think it isn't. And people shouldn't be using Reverse DNS for spam checks, either. This has been hashed out on both DNSOP and Namedroppers. People have known not to do this for a long time, but some still insist on it. For that reason alone, this is a good idea. --Dean On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Keith Moore wrote: > so now verisign is deliberately misrepresenting DNS results. > > why are these people allowed to live? > >