Re: POP3 has no EHLO! (yup). There is no POP4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/9/03 at 9:09 AM -0400, Dan Kolis wrote:

How is anything supposed to extend POP3 then? No Way I guess?

RFC 2449: POP3 Extension Mechanism.


One that occurs to me is to have a last ditch SPAM hook of some kind to plumb in a process to evaluate "grade" messages.

This is either an SMTP mechanism or a local storage mechanism. I don't see where in the POP download process you would put this.


Maybe even authenticate them; (or apply site crypto. Not very strong really).

POP already has authentication (RFC 1734) and TLS (RFC 2595), but I don't think that's what you're talking about. I don't see how crypto or authentication apply to spam in the context of POP here.


pr
--
Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick@qualcomm.com>
QUALCOMM Incorporated


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]