> Jeroen Massar wrote: > > [?Does this need to keep going to both ietf@ietf.org & > > ipng@sunroof?] > > > > Not as far as I am concerned. If we take the suggested path, the work > is clearly outside the IPv6 WG, only because you insist that the layer belongs between 4 and 7. but since the layer belongs between 3 and 4, or maybe between 2 and 3, it clearly does impinge on IPv6.