Re: Much Regreted

[Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>]

Without beginning to understand the physics involved, I think it would be a 
loss if short concise postings like yours [1] were to be discouraged from 
this IETF list.  I do think the occasional challenge to conventional 
thinking is very healthy and desirable.

#g
--

[1] http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg21526.html

At 21:31 09/07/03 -0700, NM Research wrote:
> Sorry for the posting. Much regretted to have caused a storm, and I have 
> received your complaints both public and private in good faith.
>
> I was just trying to emphasize that the current solid state physics and 
> protocols that IETF discusses cannot be sustained in the future if quantum 
> internet systems are to realized.
>
> At times absurdity in the present my be reality in the future.
>
> Regrets,
> Nyagudi
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://rd.yahoo.com/evt=1207/*http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/>SBC 
> Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E