RE: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Keith Moore" <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: RE: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP )
From: "Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:29:49 -0700
Cc: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, <ietf@ietf.org>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Thread-index: AcM7cWQ5IXJkQ9GRRv6Bm2SnItVHJQAAAVTg
Thread-topic: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP )

> what you propose would make every app NAT-sensitive, and
> increase the rate of failures due to intermediaries that
> intercept protocol interactions and botch them.

You do have a point here. Stupid idea it was.

Michel.

Prev by Date: RE: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP )
Next by Date: SRV (was Re: UPNP was :RE: myth ...)
Previous by thread: Re: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP )
Next by thread: Re: 57th IETF - Social Event
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]