] Michel Py wrote: ] But what would be _really_ cool is if you could do this: ] Server1: 192.168.1.10:80 <-> x.y.z.t:80 ] Server2: 192.168.1.11:80 <-> x.y.z.t:80 ] Server3: 192.168.1.12:80 <-> x.y.z.t:80 ] ** and ** have the UPNP box select the proper NAT association ] based on the requests. > Keith Moore wrote: > no, that would be *really* ugly. because then you'd expect the > NAT box to know how to intercept every application you'd want > to use, despite the fact that those applications are evolving > and the set of those apps is changing constantly. so you'd have > to upgrade your NAT every time you upgraded installed a new app. What's the difference with the way it already is? The ALG component does need to know about the app already. Michel.