Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/6/03 13:27, J. Noel Chiappa wrote:

> The big problem is incoming connections - how do you set up the mappings they
> will need? Wiretapping DNS is ugly, but it doesn't require changing anything
> (for existing applications). On the other hand, if you only want to support
> incoming connections for new applications, you can define them to include
> some sort of MidCom-like setup.

Aren't Microsoft already "standardizing" this with their Universal Plug and
Play (UPnP) architecture?

I'm a little fuzzy on the details, but I believe the concept is that
applications that understand this can communicate with the router (the NAPT
box in the case of SoHo networks) and request ports to be opened externally
and forwarded back to the host. I think Microsoft's NetMeeting conferencing
program supports this already and there are a few ADSL modem/routers that
implement it.

I agree that NAPT is here for a long time and it would be better to work
towards controlling it.

Jonathan

-- 
Jonathan Hogg
Director, Technology

Seventh Wave Systems Ltd.
4-14 Tabernacle Street
London EC2A 4LU
Telephone: +44 20 7074 0423

<http://www.seventh-wave-systems.com/>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]