"J. Noel Chiappa" wrote: > > > From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> > > > The reason that we are explaining (once again) why NAT sucks is that > > some people in this community are still in denial about that > > The person who's most in denial around here is you - about how definitively > the market has, for the moment, chosen IPv4+NAT as the best balance between > cost and effectiveness. > > Get a grip. We all know you don't like NAT. You don't need to reply to > *every* *single* *message* *about* *NAT* explaining for the 145,378,295th > time how bad they are. Legend tells us Cato, a Roman senator during the Punic Wars, finished every speech he made in the Senate with the words "Carthage Must Be Destroyed". It didn't matter if it was a speech about defense, or monetary policy or the Roman water works. His one-eyed devotion to this task was, well, determined. Keith sort of puts me in mind of Cato... - peterd (CMBD) PDF: I've decided that as punishment for joining in "Yet Another Flamewar About NATs" (YAFAN), I must now append something suitable to every message.