RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 11:51  AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> 
> > The key in my view is to work on the NAT vendors, instead 
> of viewing 
> > NAT
> > boxes as an obstacle they should be seen for what they 
> really are, an
> > essential and important part of the internet infrastructure.
> 
> you obviously don't write applications.

No, because I design and use applications I really wish that the IETF
had designed a decent NAT box spec rather than adopting the ostrich
position.

		Phill


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]