Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What sort of message volume do you see?

How much disk storage do you have?

		--Dean

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Keith Moore wrote:

> > I think that having all bounces (for whatever reason) archived is
> > fine; I think having it as "web pages somewhere" is overkill.
>
> both the volume of spam, and the ratio of spam to legitimate content are
> so high, that I'm not sure how much longer it will be practical to
> archive it.  if we were to archive rejected messages, it should probably
> only be for a few weeks.
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]