Re: Certificate / CPS issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 08:30:34 BST, Haren Visavadia <haren@btopenworld.com>  said:
> The CA holds no warranty, making the certificate invalid in legal terms,
> since they can not prove the certificate is yours.

IANAL, but you better check with a lawyer on that one.  Depending where you
live, a digital signature *could* be binding even if it's invalid... Yes,
there's some broken legislation out there...

Also, remember that a signature merely proves the signed data and the
public key were accessible to a computational device at the same time.
This is a LONG stretch from actually meaning you signed it intentionally.
See Schneier's "Secrets and Lies", there's a whole chapter on this point,
or just wait till somebody you know gets nailed with the next Sobig/Nimda/Klez
or whatever, and ask if any of the mail they sent out was intentional. ;)

Attachment: pgp00265.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]