Re: authenticated email

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Haren Visavadia" <haren@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: authenticated email
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 21:18:17 +0200
Cc: <anthony@atkielski.com>, <ietf@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <004401c32b85$cb53d720$0100010a@MyHomeLAN.local>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org

On donderdag, jun 5, 2003, at 19:13 Europe/Amsterdam, Haren Visavadia wrote:

Each CA has its own CPS. How do you the CA conduct its CPS accordingly?

Fortunately, as far as the spam issue is concerned, this question is moot: unlike a breach of confidentiality, a breach of spamfreeness is readily detectable. CAs that do a bad job here will be out of (this) business fast.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: authenticated email
  - From: Haren Visavadia
- RE: authenticated email
  - From: Haren Visavadia

Prev by Date: Certificate / CPS issues
Next by Date: Re: Result of test - authenticated email
Previous by thread: Re: authenticated email
Next by thread: RE: authenticated email
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]