william@elan.net wrote: > I don't think posting message size is quite appropriate as part of > your statistics and even more particularly as a criteria to order the > list. Unless I'm mistaken you're calculating bytes for entire message > but often > 75% comes from another message being replied to That has its own implications, which IMHO should definitely be taken into account. 'Nuff said? -- David J. Aronson, Unemployed Software Engineer near Washington DC See http://destined.to/program/ for online resume, and other info