RE: spam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  > > However, creating new publick/private key pairs is an incredibly
>  > > expensive operation, and one that a legitimate email wouldn't
have to
>  > > do very often, but a spammer would if we just keep blacklisting
their
>  > > keys.
>  >
>  > Uh? Creating a Diffie-Hellman public/private key pair is actually
quite
>  > simple. Even an RSA pair is not all that hard, considering that a
set
> of
>  > N prime numbers can generate N.(N-1)/2 key pairs. The logical
>  > consequence of authenticated e-mail is bound to be authenticated
> spam...
> 
> You don't see that as a step in the right direction?

It depends whether you use something like PGP or something like PKI. If
PGP or PGP-like, then the spammers can very easily create throw away
identities, and we have not gained much. In fact, spammers seldom fake
the email addresses of one of your friends, so a PGP solution would not
be a dramatic improvement over simply maintaining a "white list" of
friendly email addresses. 

If PKI or PKI-like, then the spammers would need to obtain an actual
certificate for each of their throwaway identities. But so would
everyone else, which implicitly limits the cost of obtaining a
certificate to whatever the public can bear, and the amount of identity
checks to whatever the public is willing to accept, which today is an
e-mail reachability test. So, the spammers will be slowed down, but not
much.

-- Christian Huitema




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]