Re: spam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony,

So, because YOU have fast access and YOU are sitting at home, "the
argument of costliness just doesn't hold water."

I guess you could make the same argument about many other things, oh say
for example: "you don't need an umbrella, just stay inside when it rains".

Nice logic. Not.

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Tue, 27 May 2003, Anthony Atkielski wrote:

> Theodore writes:
>
> > It's a lot more costly than time just to
> > "hit delete".  It's the time to determine
> > whether it's spam, or something valuable,
> > since the cost of accidentally deleting something
> > valuable can be very, very costly indeed.
>
> That requires only a fraction of a second for me.
>
> > It's the cost to download mail.
>
> Here again, only a fraction of a second.
>
> > I'm currently travelling in Wales, and my
> > internet access is (a) slow, and (b) expensive.
>
> I'm at home, and my access is (a) fast and (b) cheap.
>
> The argument of costliness just doesn't hold water.
>
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]