Re: Joint legal/technical anti-spam effort

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Technical measures:
> 
>   Short-Term
> 
>     - RCPT TO response codes signifying acceptance levels, EG:
> 
>     - 250 (default) what the law allows by default
> 
>     - 255 (stiff) no solicitations at all
> 
>     - 259 (extreme) no trespassing -- authorized senders only
> 
>     - 25x allows interoperability but other codes may be more useful,
> 
>     - especially considering different jurisdictions will likely need
>       their own codes
> 
>     - organizations can set default as policy requires, or can allow
>       users to set according to preference

 - virtual "no soliciting" signs may be more appropriate in some cases.

 - allow receiver to provide an (optional) indication of the receiving
host's or users's legal jurisdiction(s), so that the spammer can't
claim they don't know which set of rules apply.

						- Bill


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]