moore@cs.utk.edu (Keith Moore) writes: > we need to get rid of site-locals. merely renaming them as private use > addresses wouldn't solve any of their problems. this is debatable. (i disagree, but the debate remains open.) > there's no advantage to moving to IPv6 if it repeats the RFC 1918 mistake. this is not debatable, since it depends on facts not in evidence/consensus. there are more rfc1918 end hosts than there are non-rfc1918 end hosts, and the uses being made of rfc1918 aren't limited to "couldn't get enough unique address space" situations. calling it a mistake, merely in passing, would remove you from any debate on the dependent issues.