RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eliot Lear wrote:
> Nobody ignored anything.  To start with, the application 
> community has 
> had to work around these sorts of problems.  This is why 
> there are SIP 
> proxy gateways, STUN services, and MX gateways.  All of these 
> exist due 
> to connectivity limitations (either intentional or 
> architectural).  All 
> of these cases fall under the "Got Lemons?  make lemonade" 
> approach.  So 
> I believe you've mischaracterised the community.

Those are all examples of building complexity into the infrastructure so
that the app can maintain the fantasy that the world is flat. Personally
I would rather see the Lemons turned into a nice desert than squeezed
and watered down.

Tony






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]