Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi -

> From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> Cc: <ietf@ietf.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2003 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?
>

>
> RP> If this is true, when can we expect
> RP> http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt
> RP> to be updated to reflect this change?
>
> Probably not.
>
> 1.  There are bigger things to spend our staff resources on
>
> 2.  It is typical for formal documents to state requirements that are
> more stringent than actually practised.  In this case, the deviation is
> small and the benefit of following the formal requirement is real.
...

Ok, let me ask another way:
Who has the list of which items from
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt
that can be ignored, particularly when we're
reviewing documents before giving them to the IESG?

Randy





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]