Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On mandag, mars 31, 2003 16:44:35 -0800 Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:

In any event, please note that the suggestion that applications are
required to use names, rather than IP addresses, is new.

Completely new.

As in, it has not been part of the Internet architecture for the past 25
years.

RFC 1958, June 1996:


4. Name and address issues

  4.1 Avoid any design that requires addresses to be hard coded or
  stored on non-volatile storage (except of course where this is an
  essential requirement as in a name server or configuration server).
  In general, user applications should use names rather than addresses.

yes, "required" is new, and IMHO unspportable.

Harald



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux