Ted,
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 05:03 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:If you were using some of an allocated portion as routable addresses
and some as unrouted addresses, you might be forced to change the
unrouted addresses as a consequences of choosing someone new to carry
the traffic from the routed portions of your network. That would carry
the same pain of renumbering it always does.
Which, of course, implies NAT ("where's there's pain, there's NAT"? :-)).
Anyhow, this is the wrong list for this discussion...
Rgds, -drc
"where there's pain, there's NAT"--are you sure you have these in the right
order? :^)
I'll respond further by private email, as I agree that we're now a bit far afield
of the IETF main list's normal function.
Ted