RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eliot Lear wrote:

> Tony Hain wrote:

<SNIP>

> > SL was set aside because
> > there are people that either want unrouted space, or don't want to
> > continuously pay a registry to use a disconnected network.
> 
> Any address space can be unrouted address space.  Fix the underlying 
> problem, Tony.  Making renumbering easy.  If we don't do 
> that, IPv6 is no better than Ipv4 (with the possible exception of
MIPv6).

How does TCP/IP renumber your DNS, administration databases,
numberous applications, remote sites etc?

Seeing that route filtering only gets done automaticaly for
the last couple of years and the fact that that is only a
route + ASN mapping I don't see why all of a sudden there
will be some magical solution for renumbering complete networks.
Though current IPv6 with RA's does make it simpler it unfortunatly
isn't a complete solution :(

Greets,
 Jeroen




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]