Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:29:27 -0500
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <16719349603.20030228141342@brandenburg.com>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org

The idea what we can ever proceed without a Last Call strikes me as a
fundamental anathema for the IETF.

agree entirely

Keith

References:
- Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?
Next by Date: Re: Registration silliness
Previous by thread: Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]
Next by thread: Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]