RE: Network Working Group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I totally support your suggestion. I think it is best if
the RFCs mention the specific name of the WG that created them
instead.

-Shahram

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:17 PM
>To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
>Cc: ietf@ietf.org
>Subject: Network Working Group
>
>
> From your draft IESG Charter:
>
>>Network Working Group
>
>40 years ago a group of researchers was funded by DARPA to study 
>packet-based communications, one part of which was the Network Working 
>Group. Part of this group has since become the IRTF's End2End Research 
>Group, and the rest of the functions have devolved on the IAB 
>and the IETF. 
>The Network Working Group, as such, has not been functional 
>for nearly 20 
>years.
>
>I personally would like to see us stop attributing documents 
>to them.  The 
>world has long since moved on, and those who don't recognize it date 
>themselves. 
>
>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]