Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Francis" == Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr> writes:
    mcr> The "nicest" solution that I can see is for the ISPs to
    mcr> transparently proxy port 25 to their MTA. They should offer
    mcr> STARTTLS.
   
    Francis> => I don't understand the word "transparently" here (:-). If one
    Francis> of my ISPs does such things, I'll sue it immediately: we have
    Francis> laws in France to protect the secrecy of private mails. I'll be
    Francis> surprised if there is none in USA.

  "transparently" means that it splices itself into the TCP connection,
creating a new connection to your intended destination. 
  cf: transparent HTTP proxies, and alg firewalls such as Janus (Borderware),
Blackhole (SecureIt), and Eagle (Axent).

  I'm not in the USA, so I can't speak about it.
  I think that legislating that email is private doesn't help make it so.
Deploying PGP or S/MIME widely, and educating people about its use would be
more effective.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPmNZDIqHRg3pndX9AQGAQwQAhfq6/7cBjXA5Q7Vgd1LGqADBHHMsGPWL
XjSTzJdNuwKiSCja/F89dnIaSD6QtCe1gjH68LyTz51VQT105+mH0gHnY27kooHS
10jIS6FuVbczypI4pgMgw9xT7tTaNHV7mHhDnQYz3D3bKToOhNMP3RXEP6H8a/ia
1L5Vy43EBcI=
=h/eG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]