Hi All, On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request to consider CR-LDP Extensions for ASON > <draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-crldp-ason-ext-02.txt> as an Informational RFC. > This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF > Working Group. I have two comments about this draft. The first is that the draft calls for assignment of code points for some new messages, TLVs and status codes. The draft, however, fails to say from which spaces these should come (e.g., that to be allocated by IETF Consensus, First Come First Served, Experimental). If this is not specified, then I would suggest that code points from Experimental spaces be used. If code points are to be allocated from the space to be allocated by IETF Consensus, I strongly suggest that a *Standards Track* document be written, with more detail on the messages, especially their processing. Also, more detail on what the goal is here, under what circumstances these messages need to be sent/replied to, etc. Kireeti.