...However your new p-integer does allow for 0 which is still a non-useful value for LATENCY.
I agree the zero has no meaning - I'lll fix that. However if a initiator wishes to wait a very long time for the responder to complete, that is up to them. It does not stop the responder from responding earlier and it does not stop the responder from sending some kind of error before the timeout, both of which terminate the command. Your example of 24 hours seems excessive to me, but I would rather not limit it in the protocol as I feel the CUA and the CS implementations can decide. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- Doug@Royer.com | Office: (208)612-INET http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature