Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did NotTell You)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did NotTell You)
From: Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:42:53 -0500 (EST)
Cc: <owner-ietf@IETF.ORG>, Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, Steve Hotz <hotz@NEW.NET>, <pekkas@netcore.fi>, <vinton.g.cerf@wcom.com>, <ietf@IETF.ORG>
In-reply-to: <13029654450.20021127143625@tribalwise.com>
Sender: owner-ietf@IETF.ORG

On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Dave Crocker wrote:

> if new.net were so sure of the efficacy of their approach, why do they
> (redundantly) use new.net in the ICANN/IANA root?

they want to be backwards compatible with the old legacy internet.

References:
- Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: namedroppers mismanagement, continued
Next by Date: Re: namedroppers mismanagement, continued
Previous by thread: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Next by thread: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]