[cc's trimmed] Regardless of the specifics of this case, I think a good rule would be to say that all bounced messages on any IETF list MUST be archived on a separate 'bounced' list. To whom would this suggestion best be directed? On 27 Nov 2002, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > Once again: Bush is (1) subjecting a huge number of legitimate messages > to manual review and (2) silently discarding many of these legitimate > messages, apparently at a rate of hundreds per year (not counting mine). > > Both #1 and #2 are unacceptable. I want the manual reviews _eliminated_. > If a message isn't posted immediately, it must be bounced, with a clear > explanation of how to have it posted without Bush's intervention. > > If the IETF documentation doesn't make sufficiently clear that Bush's > behavior is unacceptable, that documentation also has to be fixed. > > ---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, > Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago > > -- Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm -->It's hot here.<--