Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Fred Baker wrote:

> At 05:44 PM 9/24/2002 +0200, TOMSON ERIC wrote:
> >Last, while I definitely, clearly prefer calling Layer 2 data units
> >"FRAMES", I sometimes [over-]simplify the terminology of Layer 3 by making
> >the following distinction : "a datagram is the data unit before
> >fragmentation" ; "a packet is a piece of a fragmented datagram".
>
> :^)
>
> A fragment of a datagram is itself a datagram; after you re-assemble them,
> the result is still a datagram.

A datagram is self-describing; full source and destination. A fragment
(IPv4 fragment) may not be.

L.

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux